Transparency

How we compare and score exchanges

Every score on Chain Wealth is produced by a consistent, documented framework. This page explains exactly how we research, test, weight, and update our ratings.

๐Ÿ“… Updated May 2026 ๐Ÿ”„ Reviewed monthly

Overview

Chain Wealth scores each exchange on a 10-point scale. The overall score is a weighted average of eight individual criteria scores, each researched independently. We do not accept payment, free accounts, or promotional incentives from exchanges in exchange for favourable coverage.

8Criteria measured
10Point scale
MonthlyUpdate cadence
0Paid placements

Our 8 scoring criteria

1. Trading fees (weight: 20%)

We compare maker fees, taker fees, withdrawal fees, and deposit fees. Where fee tiers apply, we calculate the effective cost at three trading volumes: beginner ($1,000/month), active ($10,000/month), and advanced ($100,000/month). Exchanges with transparent, competitive, and easy-to-understand fee structures score highest.

2. Security standards (weight: 20%)

We assess two-factor authentication options, cold storage practices, insurance coverage, past security incidents and how they were handled, regulatory compliance, and penetration testing disclosures. An exchange's response to previous hacks or breaches is heavily weighted in this criterion.

3. Asset availability (weight: 15%)

The total number of tradeable cryptocurrencies and tokens, the availability of major pairs (BTC, ETH, SOL, etc.), fiat on/off ramp coverage, and whether the exchange supports staking or yield products.

4. User experience (weight: 15%)

How easy is the exchange to use for a first-time investor? We evaluate the onboarding flow, mobile app quality, interface clarity, advanced charting tools, and the availability of a beginner mode. Both mobile and desktop experiences are assessed.

5. Customer support (weight: 10%)

Support channel availability (live chat, email, phone), average response times based on third-party reports and community data, and the quality of help documentation. We specifically test how exchanges handle account access and KYC escalations.

6. Withdrawal reliability (weight: 10%)

Speed and reliability of cryptocurrency and fiat withdrawals, historical incidents of delayed withdrawals, supported withdrawal methods, and withdrawal limit policies. This criterion is weighted more heavily for users who report withdrawal problems.

7. Regulatory standing (weight: 5%)

Licences held, jurisdictions supported, compliance with local regulations, and any enforcement actions or sanctions from regulatory bodies. Exchanges with clear, up-to-date regulatory disclosures score highest.

8. Deposit methods (weight: 5%)

Number of supported fiat deposit methods (bank transfer, card, PayPal, etc.), processing times, deposit fees, and minimum deposit amounts.

Score weighting summary

CriterionWeightWhat we measure
Trading fees20%Maker, taker, withdrawal, deposit fees across 3 volume tiers
Security20%2FA, cold storage, insurance, incident history, compliance
Asset availability15%Number of assets, major pairs, staking, fiat ramps
User experience15%Onboarding, mobile app, interface, beginner friendliness
Customer support10%Channels, response times, documentation quality
Withdrawal reliability10%Speed, method variety, historical delays, limits
Regulatory standing5%Licences, jurisdictions, enforcement actions
Deposit methods5%Payment options, processing time, fees, minimums

Research process

Our research process for each exchange review involves:

Update frequency

All exchange listings are reviewed on a monthly cycle. We update scores immediately when a significant event occurs โ€” such as a security incident, regulatory action, major fee change, or platform outage. The date of last review is displayed on every listing.

Editorial independence

Chain Wealth earns revenue through referral partnerships with exchanges. When you click through to an exchange and create an account, we may receive a commission. This is disclosed on every page. However, commercial relationships have no influence on our scoring, ranking, or editorial content. Our full policy is explained in our Editorial Policy.

๐Ÿ“ฉ Spotted an error? If you believe any information in our exchange reviews is inaccurate, please contact us. We take accuracy seriously and will investigate promptly.